CANCER
Dietary Lycopene and Disease Risk
Brain Cancer- main findings
- Inconclusive
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 1
- Risk estimates = 1
- (-) = 0
- N = 0
- (+) = 1
- (-) = 0

Breast Cancer- main findings
- Data support a neutral, although potentially protective, relationship between dietary lycopene and breast cancer risk
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 17
- Risk estimates = 18
- (-) = 6
- N = 12
- (-) = 6

Cervical Cancer- main findings
- Data suggest a protective relationship between dietary lycopene intake and cervical cancer; however studies are few with limited sample size and the p-value for 1 ‘protective’ inferring risk estimate was modest (p=0.10).
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 2
- Risk estimates = 3
- (-) = 3
- Risk estimates by Tomato or Lycopene category
- √GT G. Tom = 1 (-)
- √Lyc Lyco = 2 (-)

Colorectal Cancer- main findings
Data support a neutral association between dietary lycopene and colorectal cancer risk; however 2 relatively large observational studies are suggesting a risk relationship associated dietary lycopene intake. These findings require follow up.
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 13
- Risk estimates = 14
- (-) = 3
- N = 9
- (+) = 2
Endometrial Cancer- main findings
- Data indicate a neutral relationship between dietary lycopene and endometrial cancer risk.
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 4
- Risk estimates = 4
- (-) = 1
- N = 3
Gastric/oral (Upper GI) Cancer- main findings
- Data support a neutral, potentially protective relationship for some people between dietary lycopene and gastric/upper GI cancer.
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 11
- Risk estimates = 11
- (-) = 4
- N = 7
Lung Cancer- main findings
- Data support a neutral, although favoring protective, relationship between dietary lycopene and lung cancer.
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 6
- Risk estimates = 6
- (-) = 2
- N = 4
Ovarian Cancer- main findings
- Data suggest that dietary lycopene is neutral in its association with ovarian cancer; however, processed tomato consumption may provide some level of protection.
- Menopausal status may be an important factor for determining benefit of lycopene/lycopene-rich foods.
- One study suggested the benefit of dietary lycopene was specific to premenopausal women, whereas alpha-carotene was beneficial in postmenopausal women.
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 4
Risk estimates (RE) = 5
- (-) = 2
- N = 3
Risk estimates by Tomato or Lycopene category
- √PT P. Tom = 1 (-)
- √Lyc Lyco = 1 (-), 3 (N)
Pancreatic Cancer - main findings
- The data indicate a limited possible protective association between dietary lycopene, and tomatoes as a source of lycopene, and pancreatic cancer. Data are limited.
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 2
- Risk estimate (RE): 3
- (-) = 2
- N = 1
- Risk estimates by Tomato or Lycopene category
- √GT G. Tom = 1 (-)
- √Lyc Lyco = 1 (-), 1 (N)

Prostate Cancer- main findings
- Data may support a protective relationship between dietary lycopene intake and prostate cancer risk.
- Tomatoes (as a general category) or processed tomatoes (specifically) are main sources of dietary lycopene and support a protective effect of tomato/lycopene-rich foods on prostate cancer.
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 15
- Risk estimates (RE) = 21
- (-) = 13
- N = 8
- Risk estimates by Tomato or Lycopene category
- √GT G. Tom = 4 (-)
- √PT P. Tom = 2 (-)
- √Lyc Lyco = 7 (-), 8 (N)
Renal Cell Cancer- main findings
- Data support a neutral relationship between dietary lycopene intake and renal cell cancer risk.
Summary of studies and outcomes
- Number of studies = 3
- Risk estimates (RE) = 3
- N = 3
- Risk estimates by Tomato or Lycopene category
- √GT G. Tom = 0
- √PT P. Tom = 0
- √Lyc Lyco = 3 (N)
Uterine Cancer- main findings
- 1 PC study (n=6302 cases, cohort 82,512, Nurses’ Health Study II)
- RE: N
Mortality- main findings
Total Mortality (EPIC-Spain) [2007, 2008 publications – same data, different Journals]'
- PC study (n=562 deaths of ~ 41,000)
- RE: (-)